Retail AI agent · Conformity documents

Product-Conformity Documentation AI Agent

Line up the certificates, declarations and test reports each destination market requires against what is actually on file, and hold the gaps for the compliance specialist who signs.

Typical delivery
4–6 weeks
Deployment
Your stack
Named signer
Per market
After launch
Agent Care

What this agent does

Proves the document exists, never that it complies

In

  1. 01

    A product is onboarded, and the agent lists the certificates, declarations and reports each market requires.

  2. 02

    A supplier document arrives, and it is filed against the requirement it is meant to answer.

Reason

  1. 03

    A test report ages, and its currency and the laboratory accreditation are checked.

  2. 04

    A harmonised standard is withdrawn, and the reference on file is marked stale.

  3. 05

    A change notice reaches the product, and a person is asked whether it is a material change.

Decide

  1. 06

    A declaration is drafted, and the signature block is left for the signer.

  2. 07

    A market is added to the listing, and the file is re-checked.

Out

  1. 08

    An entry is filed, and since 8 July 2026 the certificate data set goes with it and must match the line.

  2. 09

    Execute write actions only inside the approval boundaries agreed during implementation.

Product statement

The agent assembles the file; a named natural person signs the EU declaration under sole responsibility, and no assembly of evidence stands in for that.

Example workflow

One product, file to signature

  1. 1Product record receivedPIM entry, supplier pack, factory test report or certificate
  2. 2Requirements resolvedCertificates, declarations, reports and notified-body documents each market asks for
  3. 3File assembledCoverage, currency, accreditation status and confidence
  4. 4Controls appliedRequirement-coverage checks, test-report currency, laboratory accreditation and confidence threshold

No human action required

Stages 1 to 4 run unaided, and nothing is declared at any of them — the agent is assembling, and the specialist's lane opens at the confidence gate.

5DecisionBranches at the confidence threshold
High confidence

Goes to the product compliance specialist.

Low confidence

Adds a regulatory counsel read first.

Specialist approval

The file is held with its gaps, its expiry dates and the confidence.

Approve · Amend · Send to counsel

Approved — released to sign

  1. 6Product record updatedOnly where write access and approval policy allow it
  2. 7Outcome evaluatedRequirement coverage, document currency, filing reconciliation and post-signature corrections

Amendments

Specialist amendments are counted in the evaluation.

What should not run autonomously

Human approval stays in control

Outside the boundary — human approval required

8 items

  • Signing or issuing the EU declaration of conformity.
    • Certifying that a product complies with a rule.
    • Determining that a change is a material change.
    • Affixing a CE or UKCA mark to a product or its label.
  • Automation boundary

    Agent acts unaided

    • ✓Line up the documents each destination market requires per product.
    • ✓Check each test report for currency and accreditation.
    • ✓Track the signatory, the function and the date on file.
    • ✓Report the gaps that must close before a listing or a shipment goes.

    Assembly is a fact about the file. The signature is a named person's, under sole responsibility.

    • Deciding which entity is the finished product certifier.
    • Judging whether a test report supports the certificate.
    • Filing certificate data with the customs entry.
  • Changes to market, requirement or approval rules.

Example output

One product file, annotated

What the agent records is attached to the document it came from.

Conformity output · single product

Illustrative example
Product
Mains-powered lamp
What the file shows
Declaration on file, and a test report still inside its currency window
Markets
EU and Great Britain
Document on file
Declaration of conformity
Confidence
93%
Signature
Named person, stated function

As received

Taken from the declaration and the test report as filed — nothing on this side is asserted by the agent.

Documents on file

  • EU declaration signed
  • Accredited lab report
  • UK declaration on file

Why the signature is here

The US rule is silent on a signature; the EU declaration is not, and names one.

What the score decides

Below the configured threshold the file adds a counsel read before it reaches the specialist.

Action

ApproveAmendSend to counsel

Value

Where AI adds value

The same four claims, placed at the point in the workflow where each one applies.

Where the value lands

Value 01 – 04

Every product line

From the documents on file

03Assembly

Build the file from the documents

Draw on the certificates and declarations on file. A declaration that cannot be supported takes the presumption of conformity with it for the whole model, and the copy is retained ten years.

01Approved path

A document, not a belief

Coverage is read off the documents on file, not off a mark on the carton. GAO reported in January 2026 that no detailed plan yet covered overseeing that filing.

02Human review

The specialist the catalogue defers to

The catalogue agent copies certification fields from the documents on file; this one proves those documents exist, are current, and cover the market published into.

04

Build an evidence trail

The product, the document it rests on and the person who signed stay on the file.

Integrations

Typical integrations

Five system groups connect to the same agent. Which of them are in scope is decided in discovery.

  • Product and PIM

    • Akeneo
    • Salsify
    • inRiver
    • Product records
  • Supplier documents

    • Supplier document portals
    • Certificate stores
  • Testing and certification

    • SGS
    • Intertek
    • TUV
    • Bureau Veritas

Agent

Product-conformity documentation

  • Reads the file
  • Checks the currency
  • Holds for the signer
  • Customs and entry

    • ACE filing feeds
    • Entry line data
  • Observability & evaluation

    • OpenTelemetry
    • Langfuse
    • Supported monitoring/evaluation sources

Integration availability depends on the client's existing systems and API access.

Agent controls

Six layers between the model and the signature

The six read outward to inward. What none of them stops is set out in the map below.

L6 · Outermost — last line of defence

Inward → L1 · closest to the model

L6Rollback / safe modeRevert to conformity-file assembly when evaluation or production signals degrade.Roll back
L5Version monitoringTrack model, prompt, requirement-rule and market-configuration changes.Track
L4TraceabilityRecord the requirement, the document, the expiry and what the specialist was shown.Record
L3Specialist approvalHold files for the named specialist; it governs release, not whether the file is sufficient.Gate
L2Policy guardrailsTest the file against the per-market requirement list and the currency rules; a failure returns it.Restrict
L1Confidence thresholdsRoute low-confidence files to a counsel read before the specialist sees them.Require review
Model coreFile assembled — requirements, documents on file, expiry dates, gaps and confidence
L1 – L2
Test whether a file may stand
L3
Puts the release in a specialist's hands
L4 – L5
Keep the product and the document behind it
L6
Reverts to conformity-file assembly when signals degrade

How Nestack evaluates it

Evaluate the whole assembly — not only the finished file.

Coverage runs the whole depth of the workflow, and every layer is cut by slice.

Surface — the file the specialist reads

  1. E1Final-output evaluationDid each document on file match the requirement it is filed against?
  2. E2Step-level evaluationDid the agent use the right market list, rules and product record?
  3. E3Tool evaluationDid it read and write the correct product and the correct market?
  4. E4Confidence calibrationDo low-confidence files actually attract more specialist amendments?
  5. E5Slice evaluationHow does performance change across specific markets and product types?
  6. E6Business outcomeHow many files needed an amendment or a correction after signature?

Floor — the outcome the signer answers for

Failure modes

Where each failure originates in the agent

Seven failure modes, each placed where in the lifecycle it starts.

Agent lifecycle

Direction of processing →

  1. 01 · Retrieval

    1 mode

    • GS-03

      Hand-written model number

      A model designation is read off a scanned report by hand.

    Stage gathers

    Product records, supplier documents and market lists

  2. 02 · Reasoning

    2 modes

    • GS-04

      Mark taken as evidence

      A CE mark on a spec sheet stands in for the declaration.

    • GS-06

      Interval without predicate

      A longer testing interval is claimed without its predicate.

    Stage proposes

    Requirements, documents on file and confidence

  3. 03 · Tool / write

    2 modes

    • GS-02

      Identifier mismatch at entry

      Certificate and entry line carry different identifiers.

    • GS-05

      Stale signature carried

      A template reissues a signatory who has left.

    Stage writes

    Only where write access and approval policy allow it

  4. 04 · Output

    1 mode

    • GS-01

      Populated but withdrawn

      A cited standard is present though its version has lapsed.

    Stage returns

    The file the specialist reads and signs against

  5. 05 · Change / Version

    1 mode

    • GS-07

      Silent requirement regression

      A model or rule change narrows what is asked for.

    Stage tracks

    Model, prompt, requirement rules and market config

  • Sev-1 · agent acts outside the boundary
  • Sev-2 · a wrong file reaches the signer
  • Sev-3 · source degrades, file routes to review
See the complete Retail & E-commerce failure-mode catalogue

Affected slices

One market can carry nearly all the gaps

A catalogue-wide document-coverage figure can look sound while one market absorbs most of the missing and expired documents. Nestack reports coverage by market, not only in total.

Slice performance — reported separately, not only in aggregate

Illustrative example
SliceFailure rateLiftLift vs. thresholdStatus
Children's products, EU8.5%3.6×Review
Private-label toys, GB6.1%2.6×Review
Electrical goods, EU3.8%1.6×Watch
US general-use goods1.4%0.6×Normal

Bar: document-gap lift vs. US general-use baseline · scale 0–4.0× · tick marks the 2.0× review threshold

2 of 4 slices over threshold

Evidence-linked improvement

The loop closes on a new test

The loop shuts when the missing certificate is a regression case. That suite is what the next listing cleared is measured against.

Improvement cycle · five stages

Switchback — the path turns at Improve and returns at Learn

  1. 01

    Detect

    The document-gap rate rises in one market.

  2. 02

    Diagnose

    The item that went live with a certificate field nobody could fill is read back until the cause narrows to one.

  3. 03

    Improve

    Any change goes out numbered, with the products that caused it attached.

  4. 04

    Verify

    One conformity case still failing is enough to hold the release back.

  5. 05

    Learn

    One case joins the suite, one line joins the product record.

  6. Learn → Detect

    The return edge. The next detection is measured against a suite that just grew.

Typical build scope

Twelve workstreams across six weeks

The build scope read against the delivery timeline. Week structure follows the six-week plan — discovery, sources, file assembly, evaluation, integration, then production validation and handover.

Workstream

Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6

  1. 01Conformity file discovery and boundary definition.Week 1
  2. 02Supplier and test-house source assessment.Week 1, Week 2
  3. 03Per-market requirement mapping and rule configuration.Week 1, Week 2
  4. 04Product-record and document ingestion.Week 2
  5. 05File assembly and currency checking.Week 2, Week 3
  6. 06Confidence scoring and gap-flag routing.Week 3
  7. 07Specialist approval workflow.Week 3, Week 4
  8. 08PIM and certificate-store integration.Week 5
  9. 09Document and currency cases.Week 4, Week 5
  10. 10Guardrails and declaration controls.Week 4
  11. 11Document-trail instrumentation.Week 5, Week 6
  12. 12Deployment, documentation and Agent Care handover.Week 6

12 workstreams · 6 weeks · bar shows the weeks a workstream is active — several run in parallel

Final scope and sequence confirmed in discovery

Engagement tiers

What each tier includes

Rows are the capabilities named in each tier's scope. Higher tiers include everything below them.

Capability✓ in scope · — not at this tierPilotOne line, one marketProductionProduction conformity systemsAdvancedMultiple markets / brands
Introduced at Pilot
Assembly to your markets and rules✓✓✓
Specialist approval✓✓✓
Document-coverage baseline✓✓✓
Introduced at Production
Reporting by market—✓✓
Approval workflow in your systems—✓✓
Approved write-back—✓✓
Supplier-document integration—✓✓
Introduced at Advanced
Multi-regime requirement rules——✓
Multi-stage conformity approvals——✓
High product volume——✓
Multi-market conformity controls——✓
Build priceFrom $5,000From $8,000Custom quote
Final build price
Confirmed after discovery based on integrations, workflow complexity, transaction volume, approval controls and deployment requirements.
Separate from build
Build pricing is separate from recurring Agent Care, which covers managed monitoring, evaluations, incidents and verified improvements after launch.

What we need from you

What you bring, and what we build with it

Each input maps to a piece of build scope and a week in the delivery timeline.

  1. 01Your product records and market list

    Product-record ingestion and document filing

    Week 1
  2. 02Representative certificates and test reports

    Coverage baseline, requirement binding and currency checks

    Week 2
  3. 03Your per-market requirement rules

    Per-market requirement mapping and rule configuration

    Week 1
  4. 04Access to relevant APIs, feeds or exports

    Supplier and test-house assessment, then integration setup

    Week 2
  5. 05Listings you would not want pulled

    Currency cases and the evaluation suite

    Week 4
  6. 06What no declaration may assume

    Confidence scoring, gap routing, guardrails and approval controls

    Week 3
  7. 07A named compliance specialist to review files

    Specialist approval workflow, then pilot and production validation

    Weeks 5–6

Nothing else is required

Deployment, documentation and Agent Care handover are ours.

Delivery timeline

Four phases across six weeks

Each of these bands spans the weeks its phase honestly needs, which is why week five holds two.

Phase

W1

W2

W3

W4

W5

W6

  1. DiscoveryW1
  2. BuildW2 – W3
  3. EvaluateW4 – W5
  4. Pilot & LaunchW5 – W6

Week focus

W1Conformity workflow discovery, requirement mapping and the automation boundary

W2Supplier-document integration and the coverage baseline

W3File assembly, currency logic and approval controls

W4Evaluation suite, currency checks and failure-mode testing

W5PIM and entry-data integration, pilot products and targeted corrections

W6One product launch run under the compliance specialist, then Agent Care handover

Reading the band
A bar covers only the weeks its work is named in. The week 5 overlap is real, not padding.
At the end of W6
Once the conformity file validates, Agent Care assumes the agent.
Duration
Six-week plan shown · typical delivery 4–6 weeks depending on scope confirmed in discovery.

Next step · Retail AI agent

Build a conformity-file agent around the markets you sell into.

Show us your product records, your market list and your document store. The EU declaration is signed by a named natural person with a stated function, under the sole responsibility of the manufacturer, and the agent never signs it.

Typical delivery
4–6 weeks
Deployment
Your product and document store
Named signer
Per market
After launch
Agent Care available

Nestack Agents · Product-conformity documentation

AGT-RT-17 · Agent Care available after launch

Build a conformity-file agent

Four questions so the call starts from your actual setup — then pick a time that suits you.

About you
Your products

No obligation. We’ll map the workflow, name the automation boundary and tell you if an agent is the wrong answer.