Main site

Sports & Fitness AI agent · NIL disclosure

NIL Disclosure & Revenue-Share AI Agent

Build the deal file behind each agreement — the clock from execution, the payor, the standard in force when it cleared — then hand each signer the pack they attest to.

Typical delivery
4–6 weeks
Deployment
Your stack
Named signers
Evidence only
After launch
Agent Care

What this agent does

Builds the deal file, not the clearance

In

  1. 01

    An agreement is executed, and the clock runs from that moment, not from the day compliance received it.

  2. 02

    A payor is evidenced deal by deal — the institution's own rights-holder included — never taken as read.

Reason

  1. 03

    A threshold moves, and the file keeps the memorandum version that was in force on the day that deal cleared.

  2. 04

    A deal is filed with what is sold to the general public for profit and what the activation obligations fix.

  3. 05

    A running Associated-deal total is held per athlete per academic year, and never summed across a trigger change.

Decide

  1. 06

    A revenue-share agreement runs on its own clock into CAPS, and the cap position is kept on the academic year.

  2. 07

    A state duty follows the instrument that binds — Texas, California and Colorado each set a different one today.

Out

  1. 08

    A pack is built for each signer, and the file holds the submissions, the outcomes and the standard behind each.

  2. 09

    Execute write actions only inside the approval boundaries agreed during implementation.

Product statement

The agent assembles the file and keeps the standard of record; the Commission clears, and the president, the athletics director and each head coach attest.

Example workflow

One deal, execution to signature

  1. 1Agreement executedThird-party contract, revenue-share agreement or agreed payment terms
  2. 2File assembledPayor, counterparty relationship, activation obligations and the running total, each with its source
  3. 3Standard recordedThe band, the methodology version and the memorandum date in force
  4. 4Controls appliedClock checks, payor-evidence checks, state-duty checks and completeness confidence

No human action required

Stages 1 to 4 run unaided, and nothing is cleared or attested at any of them — the agent is assembling, and the compliance lane opens at the completeness gate.

5DecisionBranches at the completeness gate
File complete

Goes to the compliance director to release.

Anything thin

Adds a general-counsel read first.

Compliance review

The file is held with its clocks, its standard of record and its gaps.

Release the file · Append evidence · Send to counsel

Released — submitted by a named person

  1. 6Compliance systems updatedOnly where write access and disclosure policy allow it
  2. 7Outcome evaluatedClock margin, evidence completeness, counsel corrections and what a later review found

Corrections

Each counsel correction is counted in the evaluation.

What should not run autonomously

Human approval stays in control

Outside the boundary — human approval required

8 items

  • Determining fair market value, or any range of it.
    • Clearing a deal, or predicting that it will clear.
    • Completing or signing any attestation.
    • Submitting or affirming a deal for an athlete.

  • Automation boundary

    Agent acts unaided

    • ✓Assemble the deal file from the agreement and the evidence behind it.
    • ✓Run each disclosure clock from the execution date, per instrument.
    • ✓Record the standard in force on the day the deal cleared.
    • ✓Hold the running total and flag before the live trigger.

    Nothing leaves the file except by a named signer, inside the agreed boundaries.

    • Making the associated-entity determination itself.
    • Deciding whether a violation must be self-reported.
    • Negotiating, restructuring or repricing a deal.
  • Changes to thresholds, clocks or signer packs.

Example output

One deal, annotated

A year after the signatures this file is the evidence, and it reads for you or against you.

Deal file · single agreement

Illustrative example
Deal
Local retailer, Olympic sport
Filed as
Appearance and merchandise activation, dated and fixed
Clock
Day 2 from execution
Standard of record
23 June 2026 memorandum
Confidence
Held unreleased
Released by
The compliance director, in person

As received

Taken from the executed agreement and the memorandum in force that day — nothing here is valued by the agent.

What the file holds

  • The executed agreement
  • Payor-relationship proof
  • Activation obligations

Why no valuation here

The range runs against a dataset the Commission revises as deals clear.

What the score decides

Below the configured threshold the file picks up a counsel read before.

Action

Release the fileAppend evidenceSend to counsel

Value

Where AI adds value

The same four claims, placed at the point in the workflow where each one applies.

Where the value lands

Value 01 – 04

Each deal

From the executed agreement

03Evidence

Evidence the price, not the player

Our scouting agent evidences a player for a scout; this evidences a figure for a regulator.

01Approved path

Which standard cleared it

Five standards in fourteen months, so a file recording only cleared cannot be read back.

02Human review

Where the exposure now reaches

Executive Order 14400 made an unsupportable figure a debarment question on 1 August 2026; its reporting limb only directs consideration.

04

Build an evidence trail

The deal, the standard in force when it cleared and the signer who attested stay on the file.

Integrations

Typical integrations

Five system groups connect to the same agent. Which of them are in scope is decided in discovery.

  • Disclosure platforms

    • NIL Go
    • CAPS
    • Institutional submission portals

  • Compliance systems

    • Teamworks
    • ARMS
    • JumpForward
    • INFLCR

  • Contract and finance

    • Contract lifecycle systems
    • General ledger
    • accounts payable

Agent

NIL disclosure & revenue share

  • Reads the deal
  • Builds the file
  • Holds for the signer

  • Roster and eligibility

    • Roster and squad lists
    • Eligibility
    • scholarship records

  • Observability & evaluation

    • OpenTelemetry
    • Langfuse
    • Supported monitoring/evaluation sources

Integration availability depends on the client's existing systems and API access.

Agent controls

Six meshes between the model and the file

Six meshes, coarsest first. What falls through all of them is set out in the map below.

L6 · Outermost — last line of defence

Inward → L1 · closest to the model

L6Rollback / safe modePull the agent back to file assembly only when evaluation or production signals degrade.Roll back
L5Version monitoringTrack model, prompt, threshold-rule and memorandum-version changes.Track
L4TraceabilityRecord the agreement, the clocks, the standard applied and each read of the file.Record
L3Signer releaseHold the file for a named human; it governs release, and not whether the deal clears.Gate
L2Policy guardrailsTest the file against the clocks and the state duties on record; a failure returns it.Restrict
L1Confidence thresholdsRoute a thin file to a counsel read before the compliance director sees it.Require review
Model coreFile assembled — the deal, the clocks, the standard of record and completeness
L1 – L2
Test whether a file may stand
L3
Puts the release in a person's hands
L4 – L5
Keep the deal and the standard behind it
L6
Holds the deal at uncleared when signals degrade

How Nestack evaluates it

Evaluate the whole assembly — not only the file that comes out.

Coverage runs the whole depth of the workflow, and every layer is cut by slice.

Surface — the file a review reads

  1. E1Final-output evaluationDid the file record the standard that was in force that day?
  2. E2Step-level evaluationDid the agent use the right memorandum, the right clock and the current total?
  3. E3Tool evaluationDid it read and write the correct deal and the correct field?
  4. E4Confidence calibrationDo low-confidence files actually attract more counsel corrections?
  5. E5Slice evaluationHow does performance change across specific deal types?
  6. E6Business outcomeHow many files needed a correction before the director released them?

Floor — the outcome the institution answers for

Failure modes

Where each failure originates in the agent

Seven failure modes, set at the stage each one actually starts.

Agent lifecycle

Direction of processing →

  1. 01 · Retrieval

    1 mode

    • HS-03

      Superseded band

      The band applied is the one in force today, not that day.

    Stage gathers

    The agreement, the payor, the clocks and the memoranda

  2. 02 · Reasoning

    2 modes

    • HS-04

      Clock started from receipt

      The clock runs from the day the file was opened.

    • HS-06

      Payor taken as given

      A rights-holder is classified with nothing behind it.

    Stage proposes

    The clocks, the standard applied and completeness

  3. 03 · Tool / write

    2 modes

    • HS-02

      Trigger crossing missed

      A total passes the live trigger without a flag.

    • HS-05

      Resubmission overwrites

      A restructured deal keeps only the second outcome.

    Stage writes

    Only where write access and approval policy allow it

  4. 04 · Output

    1 mode

    • HS-01

      Cleared, standard unrecorded

      The file shows an outcome but not what produced it.

    Stage returns

    The file the signer stands behind a year later

  5. 05 · Change / Version

    1 mode

    • HS-07

      Silent threshold regression

      A rule change moves a band without moving the file.

    Stage tracks

    Model, prompt, threshold rules and memoranda

  • Sev-1 · a deal is filed outside the boundary
  • Sev-2 · a wrong standard reaches the file
  • Sev-3 · source degrades, file holds unreleased
See the complete Sports & Fitness failure-mode catalogue

Affected slices

One deal type absorbs the corrections

A programme-level standard-provenance figure can read clean while one deal type absorbs most of the corrections. Nestack reports the counsel-correction rate by deal type, not only in total.

Slice performance — reported separately, not only in aggregate

Illustrative example
SliceFailure rateLiftLift vs. thresholdStatus
Collective and associated deals9.7%3.7×Review
Multimedia-rights routed deals7.5%2.8×Review
Football and basketball deals4.5%1.7×Watch
Olympic-sport local deals1.7%0.6×Normal

Bar: counsel-correction-rate lift vs. Olympic-sport local baseline · scale 0–4.0× · tick marks the 2.0× review threshold

2 of 4 slices over threshold

Evidence-linked improvement

What an unreconstructable file costs

A cycle closes when the unreconstructable file is a regression case. That suite is what the next deal recorded is measured against.

Improvement cycle · five stages

Switchback — the path turns at Improve and returns at Learn

  1. 01

    Detect

    Counsel-correction rate rises in one deal type.

  2. 02

    Diagnose

    The two contracts with four regulatory statuses in five months are read back until one cause remains.

  3. 03

    Improve

    The change ships numbered, and the deals that forced it ride with it.

  4. 04

    Verify

    Nothing releases while one touched deal case is still red.

  5. 05

    Learn

    It is kept for good, and the threshold rules are amended in the same commit.

  6. Learn → Detect

    The return edge. The next deal is measured against a suite one case longer.

Typical build scope

Twelve workstreams across six weeks

The build scope read against the delivery timeline. Week structure follows the six-week plan — discovery, sources, file assembly, evaluation, integration, then production validation and handover.

Workstream

Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6

  1. 01Deal workflow discovery and boundary definition.Week 1
  2. 02Contract, roster and ledger sources.Week 1, Week 2
  3. 03Threshold, methodology, clock and state-duty mapping.Week 1, Week 2
  4. 04Agreement ingestion and file normalisation.Week 2
  5. 05Standard-of-record and evidence binding.Week 2, Week 3
  6. 06Completeness scoring and counsel routing.Week 3
  7. 07Signer pack workflow.Week 3, Week 4
  8. 08Compliance and ledger integration.Week 5
  9. 09Threshold and rationale cases.Week 4, Week 5
  10. 10Guardrails and attestation controls.Week 4
  11. 11Deal-trail instrumentation.Week 5, Week 6
  12. 12Deployment, documentation and Agent Care handover.Week 6

12 workstreams · 6 weeks · bar shows the weeks a workstream is active — several run in parallel

Final scope and sequence confirmed in discovery

Engagement tiers

What each tier includes

Rows are the capabilities named in each tier's scope. Higher tiers include everything below them.

Capability✓ in scope · — not at this tierPilotOne sport, one payor typeProductionProduction compliance systemsAdvancedMultiple sports / systems
Introduced at Pilot
File assembly to your rules✓✓✓
Named-signer release✓✓✓
Standard-provenance baseline✓✓✓
Introduced at Production
Reporting by sport—✓✓
Release workflow in your systems—✓✓
Approved write-back—✓✓
Compliance-system integration—✓✓
Introduced at Advanced
Multi-state disclosure duties——✓
Cross-sport signer packs——✓
High deal volume——✓
Multi-signer attestation controls——✓
Build priceFrom $5,000From $8,000Custom quote
Final build price
Confirmed after discovery based on integrations, workflow complexity, transaction volume, approval controls and deployment requirements.
Separate from build
Build pricing is separate from recurring Agent Care, which covers managed monitoring, evaluations, incidents and verified improvements after launch.

What we need from you

What you bring, and what we build with it

Each input maps to a piece of build scope and a week in the delivery timeline.

  1. 01Your deal intake and record structure

    Agreement ingestion and file normalisation

    Week 1

  2. 02Representative executed agreements

    File baseline, clock binding and standard-of-record capture

    Week 2

  3. 03Your thresholds, clocks and state duties

    Threshold, clock and state-duty mapping and the automation boundary

    Week 1

  4. 04Access to relevant APIs, feeds or exports

    Compliance, roster and ledger assessment, then integration setup

    Week 2

  5. 05Files you would not want reconstructed

    Threshold cases and failure-mode testing

    Week 4

  6. 06What no attestation may cover

    Completeness scoring, counsel routing, guardrails and release controls

    Week 3

  7. 07Named signers and a compliance director

    Signer release workflow, then pilot and production validation

    Weeks 5–6

Nothing else is required

Deployment, documentation and Agent Care handover are ours.

Delivery timeline

Four phases across six weeks

These bands are the weeks each phase honestly costs, which is why the fifth one carries a pair.

Phase

W1

W2

W3

W4

W5

W6

  1. DiscoveryW1
  2. BuildW2 – W3
  3. EvaluateW4 – W5
  4. Pilot & LaunchW5 – W6

Week focus

W1Deal discovery, threshold mapping and the automation boundary

W2Source integration and the file baseline

W3Assembly workflow, clock logic and release controls

W4Evaluation suite, threshold cases and failure-mode testing

W5Compliance integration, pilot deals and targeted corrections

W6One attestation year run under the compliance director, then Agent Care handover

Reading the band
A bar covers only the weeks its own work is named in. The doubled fifth week is real work, not padding.
At the end of W6
Validation closes on live deals, and Agent Care picks up the watch.
Duration
Six-week plan shown · typical delivery 4–6 weeks depending on scope confirmed in discovery.

Next step · Sports & Fitness agent

Build a NIL disclosure agent around the people who have to sign.

Show us how a deal reaches you today and who signs on 1 September. If your file records that a deal cleared but not which standard cleared it, then the person signing for it cannot reconstruct it, and no OMB guidance we could find says otherwise.

Typical delivery
4–6 weeks
Deployment
Your compliance systems
Named signers
Evidence only
After launch
Agent Care available

Nestack Agents · NIL disclosure & revenue share

AGT-SF-14 · Agent Care available after launch

Build a NIL disclosure agent

Four questions so the call starts from your actual setup — then pick a time that suits you.

About you
Your department

No obligation. We’ll map the workflow, name the automation boundary and tell you if an agent is the wrong answer.