Information TechnologyManaged AI Agents
Information Technology AI Agents,
Monitored for Security
Nestack Agent Care helps IT teams monitor, evaluate, and optimize AI agents used for helpdesk support, access requests, provisioning, and incident response — before small AI errors become security or downtime issues.
Scope
Information Technology AI agents we build & manage
Thirteen archetypes — from helpdesk to autonomous patching, identity lifecycle and cyber recovery.
Employee support5
- IT helpdesk
- Access-management
- Asset & license management
- Identity-lifecycle (JML)
- SaaS-spend optimization
Infrastructure3
- Infrastructure
- Network-operations
- Change-management
Security & recovery5
- Security-alert triage
- Patch-management
- Endpoint-remediation
- Phishing-response
- Backup & cyber-recovery
Observability
What we make observable
Every IT agent session is traced across ten layers — what we capture and the evidence we keep.
- Evidence we keepGoalconstraintsapproval requirement
- Evidence we keepSourceversiontimestamprelevancecitation
- Evidence we keepPlanned sequenceactual sequenceworkflow status
- Evidence we keepTask statusresultretryfailure reason
- Evidence we keepTool nameversioninputoutputpermissionresult
- Evidence we keepModel/versioninput/outputtoken usagelatencycost
- Evidence we keepEvaluation typemetricthresholdresult
- Evidence we keepGuardrail targettriggeractionenforcement result
- Evidence we keepReviewerdecisioncorrectionreason
- Evidence we keepOutcome statusbusiness resultlinked trace
Catalog
Failure modes
Filter failure modes by where they occur in the agent lifecycle—from goals and retrieval to tools, evaluations, guardrails and outcomes.
ITD-01Social-engineered resets and MFA changesSEV-1
ITD-02Insecure configuration guidance — open ports, weak TLS, permissive IAMSEV-1
ITD-03Phishing-triage misses — malicious mail marked benignSEV-1
ITD-04Access-grant errors — over-provisioning, orphaned accountsSEV-1
ITD-05Stale runbooks — outdated procedures confidently appliedSEV-2
ITD-06Ticket-data exposure — credentials and PII inside tickets surfacing broadlySEV-2
ITD-07Injection via tickets, logs and alert payloadsSEV-1
ITD-08Alert-triage suppression — true-positive security alerts auto-closed as noiseSEV-1
ITD-09Change-management misadvice — patches without windows, rollbacks or commsSEV-2
ITD-10Shadow-SaaS approval slippage — unvetted tools cleared outside security reviewSEV-2
ITD-11Asset and license misstatement — wrong counts in audits and renewalsSEV-2
ITD-12Backup-restore misguidance — wrong restore points, untested paths stated as verifiedSEV-1
ITD-13Autonomous destructive remediation — agent takes irreversible action to “fix” a problemSEV-1
ITD-14Agent-to-agent privilege escalation — a low-privilege agent recruits or inherits higher rightsSEV-1
ITD-15Stolen or abused agent OAuth tokens — delegated access reused to hit connected SaaSSEV-1
ITD-16Malicious tool / connector layer — MCP tool poisoning, rug-pull and RCE on the tool hostSEV-1
ITD-17Zero-click context exfiltration — crafted input leaks in-context data without user actionSEV-1
ITD-18Confident fabrication of policy or resolution — invented rules users act onSEV-2
ITD-19Cost and action runaway loops — retry or multi-agent loops spawn resources without capSEV-2
ITD-20Non-human-identity sprawl — orphaned “ghost” agents outliving their creatorsSEV-2
ITD-21Persistent memory / knowledge-base poisoning — planted records fire on later triggersSEV-1
ITD-22Silent model drift and regression — provider update changes behavior behind a stable endpointSEV-2
ITD-23Non-deterministic answers to identical requests — different users, different answersSEV-3
ITD-24Deflection-metric gaming — tickets closed or deflected without being resolvedSEV-3
ITD-25Agent-platform outage — vendor lock-in as a single point of failureSEV-2
ITD-26Multi-agent coordination failure — chained agents amplify single errorsSEV-2
ITD-27Lost audit attribution — shared service accounts make actions untraceableSEV-2
ITD-28Automation complacency and L1 de-skilling — eroded oversight and talent pipelineSEV-3
ITD-29Hallucinated write-back — plausible-but-wrong data written into CMDB and knowledge basesSEV-2
Guardrails
Critical guardrails for IT agents
Ten controls that hold regardless of prompt, plan or pressure. Open one to see what it protects, what trips it, what the agent is forced to do, who may release it, and what is written to the record.
GR-01No credential reset without verified requester identityOverride defined
Target
Password resets, MFA changes, recovery-code issuance and session revocations at the service desk.
Trigger
A reset or MFA change requested by chat, email, ticket or voice.
Action — enforced
Platform holds the change, forces step-up verification against registered factors, and alerts the account owner on every attempt.
Human override
Service-desk supervisor via completed step-up verification recorded on the ticket.
Logged evidenceticket id · account id · verification method and result · requester channel · change timestamp
GR-02No cross-scope context exposure from tickets or sessionsNo override
Target
Ticket bodies, credentials, PII and session context scoped to requester and assigned technicians.
Trigger
Any output or retrieval carrying context to a party outside the record’s access scope.
Action — enforced
Platform blocks the disclosure, redacts credentials and PII from indexes, and serves only records the requester may see.
Human override
None — cannot be overridden in session
Logged evidencerecord id · requester identity · blocked content hash · scope rule · timestamp
GR-03No instruction embedded in tickets, logs or alerts executedNo override
Target
Ticket text, log lines, alert payloads and attachments ingested by triage and remediation agents.
Trigger
Directive text detected in ingested operational content, including encoded and hidden payloads.
Action — enforced
Platform treats the content as data only, quarantines the artifact, and blocks writes to memory and knowledge bases.
Human override
None — cannot be overridden in session
Logged evidenceartifact hash · payload excerpt · source system · quarantine id · scanner version · timestamp
GR-04No access grant beyond role-mapped entitlementsOverride defined
Target
Group memberships, application roles, admin rights and agent permissions across directory and SaaS estate.
Trigger
A grant request exceeding the role map or lacking an owner-approved justification.
Action — enforced
Platform blocks the grant, issues time-boxed least-privilege access instead, and queues the exception for access review.
Human override
Application owner via approved access request in the IGA workflow.
Logged evidencerequest id · requested versus granted scope · role map version · approver identity · expiry timestamp
GR-05No irreversible remediation without an approved change recordOverride defined
Target
Host reimaging, account deletion, VM termination, firewall changes and forced rollbacks by remediation agents.
Trigger
Any action lacking a rollback path or touching production without a change record.
Action — enforced
Platform blocks execution, snapshots affected state first, and requires a CAB-approved change reference before the action proceeds.
Human override
Change manager via emergency change record with post-implementation review scheduled.
Logged evidencechange id · target assets · snapshot reference · approver identity · execution and rollback timestamps
GR-06No auto-closure of security alerts as noiseOverride defined
Target
SIEM detections, phishing reports and endpoint alerts in the triage queue.
Trigger
A benign or false-positive disposition on any alert above the severity floor.
Action — enforced
Platform keeps the alert open, requires analyst review with recorded rationale, and preserves the full payload for investigation.
Human override
SOC lead via documented tuning change applied to the detection rule.
Logged evidencealert id · proposed disposition · analyst identity · rationale hash · final status · timestamp
GR-07No tool call on an unpinned connector manifestOverride defined
Target
MCP servers, connectors and tool descriptions registered for service-desk and operations agents.
Trigger
A manifest or description hash differing from the version approved at onboarding.
Action — enforced
Platform refuses the call, disables the connector fleet-wide, and requires security re-approval of the changed manifest.
Human override
Security architecture via re-approval and hash pinning in the connector registry.
Logged evidenceconnector id · approved hash · observed hash · disable timestamp · re-approval record
GR-08No delegated token use outside its origin scopeOverride defined
Target
Agent OAuth tokens, service accounts and non-human identities connected to SaaS and infrastructure.
Trigger
A token exercised from a new client, scope or resource outside its issuance record.
Action — enforced
Platform revokes the token, expires ownerless identities on schedule, and reissues least-privilege credentials bound to a named owner.
Human override
Identity governance lead via re-issuance with documented owner and scope.
Logged evidencetoken id · issuance scope · observed use · revocation timestamp · new owner identity
GR-09No configuration change below the hardening baselineOverride defined
Target
Firewall rules, TLS settings, IAM policies and patch configurations advised or applied by agents.
Trigger
A recommended or executed setting weaker than the CIS-aligned baseline for that asset.
Action — enforced
Platform blocks the change, substitutes the baseline-compliant setting, and schedules it inside an approved maintenance window.
Human override
Security architect via documented risk acceptance with compensating control and expiry.
Logged evidenceasset id · proposed versus baseline setting · policy version · window reference · approver identity
GR-10No restore guidance from untested restore pointsOverride defined
Target
Backup catalogs, restore runbooks and recovery-time answers during incidents and DR tests.
Trigger
A restore path or point stated as verified without a logged test result.
Action — enforced
Platform withholds the claim, cites the last verified test with its date, and flags untested paths to the backup owner.
Human override
Backup administrator via logged restore test validating the cited point.
Logged evidencerestore point id · last test date and result · runbook version · incident id · owner notification
Oversight
Human review — triggers, decisions and evidence
When a defined risk trigger fires, the affected action is routed to a named reviewer. Every decision is recorded with its correction, escalation and final outcome for full traceability.
- ConfidenceLow-confidence alert triage
- Financial impactLicence or asset commitment
- Identity / change riskReset or MFA change
- Irreversible actionAccess grant or remediation
- Policy riskChange-window conflict
- Safety controlGuardrail override
- Quality failureFailed critical evaluation
- Revieweridentity + role
- Decisionapprove / reject / amend
- Correctionwhat changed
- Escalationwho, why and severity
- Final outcomereleased / blocked / returned for rework
7 triggers · any one halts the agent
1 record · 5 fields, every time
Compliance
Regulatory mapping
- 04 Task
- 05 Tool
- 06 LLM
- 07 Evaluation
- 08 Guardrail
Identity security
Password resets and MFA changes are the top social-engineering target in every breach report.
Lifecycle layer:04 Task · 05 Tool · 08 Guardrail
- ITD-01
Evaluations
Baseline evaluation suite — in detail
Baseline evaluations are completed during onboarding and repeated based on the selected plan. Agents that fail critical checks remain restricted until they pass re-testing.
- Detailed case sets
- 31
- Failure modes covered
- 29
- Retired & rotated / quarter
- 10%
- Audit-ready scorecard
- Monthly
Output evaluation3 suites · 190 cases
100 casesSocial-engineering suitecatches ITD-01
100 casesPhishing-triage recallcatches ITD-03
80 casesAccess-decision accuracycatches ITD-04
80 casesConfig-guidance groundingcatches ITD-02
40 casesTicket privacycatches ITD-06
60 patternsInjection suitecatches ITD-07
50 casesAlert-triage setcatches ITD-08
40 casesChange-plan setcatches ITD-09
40 casesSaaS-gating setcatches ITD-10
40 casesLicense-accuracy setcatches ITD-11
40 casesRecovery-guidance setcatches ITD-12
40 casesRunbook-freshness setcatches ITD-05
Use your work email to unlock the full grid. We use it to send the requested Agent Care material and qualify business inquiries. We do not sell or share your email.
Department lead review
For applicable high-risk agents, the client’s designated department leader reviews the evaluation criteria and pass thresholds before baseline approval.
Test-case rotation
Evaluation cases are refreshed regularly to reduce memorisation and maintain reliable performance measurement.
Scorecard integration
Scorecards track results against the approved baseline and flag material declines for review and escalation.
Department-specific extensions
Where included in scope, evaluations may be expanded using approved workflows, tools, templates, policies, and incident history.
Monitoring
Change-aware monitoring
When agent performance changes, Nestack correlates the shift with changes to the agent, prompt, model, tools, knowledge base, guardrails and evaluation suite.
- Week 1 · 97.9%
- Week 2 · 97.8%
- Week 3 · 98.0%
- Week 4 · 97.9%
- Week 5 · 98.1%
- Week 6 · 97.9%
- Week 7 · 98.0%
- Week 8 · 93.6%
- Week 9 · 93.4%
- Week 10 · 97.9%
- Week 11 · 98.0%
- Week 12 · 98.1%
Week readouthover or select
Week 8of 12
- 03Modelopus 4.6 · 0612
93.6%Triage-accuracy rate
- 7 layers stamped on every run · 12-week window
- Catches ITD-22 · silent model drift and regression
Something missing?
Don’t see your agent’s issue here?
Every AI environment is different. Share what you’re seeing, and we’ll review the behaviour, assess the risk and recommend the evaluations or controls that may help.
No commitment. Even if you never become a client, we’ll tell you what we think is happening.
Process
Universal incident runbook
Severity is assigned based on business impact, customer harm, data exposure, operational disruption and overall scope.
- SEV-1 Critical
- SEV-2 Major
- SEV-3 Moderate
- SEV-4 Minor
Automated monitoring or human review identifies unusual behaviour. Alerts are recorded and routed according to severity.
Cost control
Keep information technology AI agent costs under control
Token spend is monitored, optimised and reported as part of Agent Care — and savings never come at the expense of quality, because every change is verified against your evaluation baseline.
We review token spend by agent, workflow, model, and session so you can understand where AI costs are coming from.
Running information technology AI agents in production?
Get a free assessment of one agent. We’ll review its behaviour, run a baseline evaluation and highlight potential risks and performance gaps.
Loading open times…
Open times
Select an available date above to view open 45-minute times from our calendar.
